CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

Job announcement

3/1/2021

1 Comment

 
A job announcement on the website of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces seeks applicants for a two-year (renewable) at-will appointment as a staff attorney on the Central Legal Staff. According to the announcement:
The principal tasks of the staff attorney include:

​• Performing a comprehensive legal review and analysis of petitions for review, to include a complete de novo review of records of trial;

• Performing a comprehensive legal analysis of extraordinary writs, motions, and other pleadings;

• Preparing legal memoranda on petitions for review or other pleadings, to include recommendations for disposition;

• Preparing orders of the Court on behalf of the Clerk of the Court;

• Performing other duties as assigned. [Emphasis added.]
​he part of particular interest is the italicized language in the first bullet.  Here is what Art. 67(a)(3), UCMJ says:
The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall review the record in--
* * * 
(3) all cases reviewed by a Court of Criminal Appeals in which, upon petition of the accused and on good cause shown, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has granted a review.
"We are all textualists now," Justice Elena Kagan has famously said. As you read the text of the statute, does it contemplate that the court will conduct its own de novo review of the record of trial before it has granted review? Doesn't the past tense of the terminal "has granted a review" clause indicate that the duty to "review the record" arises only after good cause has been shown and the petition has been granted? Is the court putting the review-the-record cart before the grant-of-review-for-good-cause horse?

My personal comments would be that if done correctly, 
  • Would no issue cases be dismissed on the day after filing and so reduce the workload of the central legal staff?
  • Would there be more or less grants? Followed by an improvident grant summary disposition for those which do not have issues the court does not find meritorious and deserving of an opinion?
  • Any other consequences?

Cross-posted with permission from Gene Fidell at Global Military Justice Reform blog. Cheers, P.C.
1 Comment
Brenner Fissell
3/1/2021 08:47:01 pm

Putting Gene’s issue aside, I think this is a great opportunity for a recent grad. Careful attention to records with time to research the law and produce a memo read by 5 judges! And with mentorship from, presumably, Dave Anderson and Clark Price.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home