The National Institute of Military Justice (NIMJ) has published a statement on PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. You will see recommendations beyond what is in the current Military Justice Improvement & Increasing Prevention Act (SB1525 of 29 April 2021). NIMJ recommends transferring prosecutorial discretion not only for all sex offenses, but also for all serious offenses – those for which the authorized maximum punishment exceeds one year’s
12 Comments
5/13/2021 08:19:31 pm
Sen. Gillibrand is reporting there is a key level of support for the MJI&IPA.
Reply
Lone Bear
5/13/2021 11:21:05 pm
Totally agree with recommendation! Commanders should want independent prosecutors, it seems like it would be very valuable for good order and discipline.
Reply
Charlie Dunlap
5/14/2021 10:20:07 am
Hate to bother folks, but does anybody have a link to the current text of the bill (not sure what I have is current)? Also, would be interested in thoughts about the removal of command authority from serious cases beyond sexual assault. Thanks! Charlie
Reply
5/14/2021 10:27:15 am
Charlie, We like you do not have better copy. Checking for updates every day.
Reply
Charlie Dunlap
5/14/2021 10:34:51 am
Phil, Thanks! Kind of surprising the text is so hard to find. Candidly, I was not aware until I read some press comments that the removal of command authority extended to cases beyond sexual assault, so I'm interested in seeing that.
Reply
5/14/2021 10:43:53 am
The version we have does NOT extend beyond sex and hate crimes.
Reply
DON CHRISTENSEN
5/14/2021 11:45:57 am
Phil, the laundry list of covered offenses is in section 2(b) and it includes most common crimes with a maximum sentence of more than 1 year confinement.
Reply
Charlie Dunlap
5/14/2021 10:53:45 am
Just FYI, Dave Schlueter and Lisa Schenk have two very recent law review articles on this topic (which I am not proud to say I’ve read yet!):
Reply
5/14/2021 11:31:28 am
The impact on Defense Counsel services will not be related to the MJI&IPA. The services are robbing DC offices to increase VLC/SVC counsel--IMHO.
Reply
Charlie Dunlap
5/14/2021 01:13:27 pm
Don (or anyone, really!), Is it possible to get a copy of the current text of MJI & IPA? I'm puzzled (but may be missing something!) why the current text is so hard to find.
Reply
J.M.
5/14/2021 02:38:44 pm
What protections would be in place to protect against 'soft' UCI, such we saw in the Chief Barry or Airman Wright cases?
Reply
Brenner M. Fissell
5/14/2021 04:54:46 pm
great point. Work must be done to ensure the prosecutors are truly independent. The same could also be said about defense counsel. One model is the way that the prosecution and defense have different reporting chains in the military commissions.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Links
CAAF -Daily Journal -Current Term Opinions ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA Joint R. App. Pro. Global MJ Reform LOC Mil. Law Army Lawyer Resources Categories
All
Archives
April 2022
|