CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

Recent ACCA Opinion: United States v. Grullon

7/20/2020

 
Below is a brief description of a recent ACCA opinion.
 Background

Mikael E. Grullon (“Appellant”) pled guilty to wrongful distribution of Xanax and wrongful possession with the intent to distribute Xanax and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 13 months, and reduction to E-1.

In the Court below, the military judge inquired as to whether the distribution specification coupled with the possession with intent to distribute specification created a multiplicity issue. Relying on U.S. v. Savage, 50 M.J. 244 (C.A.A.F. 1999), the military judge dismissed the “with intent to distribute” language from Appellant’s first charge, thereby converting it to simple possession of Xanax. Appellant then stated that he understood all terms of the pretrial agreement and waived all waivable motions.
 
Issue

Whether the charge of wrongful possession with the intent to distribute Xanax was multiplicious with the charge of wrongful distribution of Xanax, and therefore should have been dismissed by the military judge.
 
Holding

In a unanimous opinion, the ACCA found that Appellant expressly waived any multiplicity issue.[1]
 
Discussion
 
The Court relied on U.S. v. Gladue, 67 M.J. 311, 314 (C.A.A.F. 2009), which states that “[w]here an appellant pleads guilty and agrees to waive all waivable motions, multiplicity claims are expressly waived and thereby foreclosed from even plain error review.

Here, after the military judge addressed the multiplicity issue by amending one of Appellant’s charges, Appellant did not object to the terms and agreed to the maximum punishment calculated in light of the amended charge. Moreover, Appellant acknowledged and agreed to the provision in his pretrial agreement waiving all waivable motions.
 
Conclusion
 
The ACCA held that Appellant expressly waived any claim of multiplicity, and stated that, under U.S. v. Campos, 67 M.J. 330, 332 (C.A.A.F. 2009), “a valid waiver leaves no error for [the Court] to correct on appeal.” 

​Grullon Opinion


[1] Judge Brookhart authored the majority opinion, which was joined by Judges Krimbill and Walker

Shlomo Amar

Intern


Comments are closed.
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home