"Orders Granting Petition for Review
No. 21-0059/MC. U.S. v. Bradley M. Metz. CCA 201900089. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:
THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE SEIZED AFTER AN ILLEGAL APPREHENSION IS GOVERNED BY BROWN v. ILLINOIS, 422 U.S. 590 (1975). DID THE LOWER COURT ERR BY FAILING TO APPLY BROWN DESPITE FINDING APPELLANT WAS ILLEGALLY APPREHENDED?
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25. [Note. The NMCCA website also lists a Metz-II, but the link doesn't work.]
No. 21-0085/AR. U.S. v. John T. Long. CCA 20150160. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED IN CONCLUDING THE IMPERMISSIBLE USE OF CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT AS PROPENSITY EVIDENCE WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
II. WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR RAPE OF A CHILD WAS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT WHERE THE GOVERNMENT PRESENTED NO EVIDENCE OF THE CHARGED SEXUAL ACT.
III. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN REASSESSING THE SENTENCE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25."
CAAFlog 1.0 Archive
-Current Term Opinions
Joint R. App. Pro.
Global MJ Reform
LOC Mil. Law Resources