Since this is "CAAFlog" and not "Bergdahl-log" we won't be saying much more about last week's decision. Two remaining items are worth mentioning: 1. The following statement by Bergdahl's trial prosecutor has been making the rounds. 2. It seems that the readers generally disagree with me and with the dissenters regarding the decision. Here are the results of our anonymous, non-scientific poll (in which the system does not prevent multiple voting, etc.). As with alcohol, "tolerance" of command influence differs from person to person: Brenner FissellEIC
1 Comment
Justin Oshana
9/3/2020 01:27:50 am
You seriously linked to the newsmax article instead of the actual op-ed?
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
|