|
"What do you folks think, other than looking forward to all the Foxtrots, Novembers, Quebecs, and Uniforms? Worthwhile promotion of privacy, serious interference with public right of access to court records, both, neither? Does it matter that this is the military justice system, rather than normal state or federal court.
Rumors that the NMCCA almost opted for the alternative of using witnesses' porn star names appear to be unfounded." Original Post Here.
2 Comments
Don Rehkopf
9/24/2020 03:32:57 pm
Is there a Classified Annex to the UCMJ that only the N-MCCA has? The only "Rule Making" Authority for CCA's is in Article 66(h) and reads in relevant part: "—The Judge Advocates General shall prescribe uniform rules of procedure for Courts of Criminal Appeals . . . ." Just wondering.
Cloudesley Shovell
9/25/2020 08:54:58 am
NMCCA deserves all the ridicule it gets for this loony idea. Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Home
About Masthead Contact/Submit Post CAAFlog 1.0 Archive Links CAAF -Daily Journal -Current Term Opinions ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA Joint R. App. Pro. Global MJ Reform LOC Mil. Law Resources Archives
April 2021
|
RSS Feed