Sailor accused of torching USS Bonhomme Richard will go to court-martial, Navy decides
From one Twitter user: "I litigated cases before CAPT Tang, and she is as sharp as they come. The Navy ignoring her recommendation that they not proceed comes as no surprise; the preliminary hearing process is a farce. Big Navy is posturing just like they did with the collision cases."
10 Comments
Nathan Freeburg
2/26/2022 02:23:22 pm
CAPT Tang is very sharp and careful.
Reply
Lone Bear
2/26/2022 07:48:46 pm
She’s the best there is, down with convening authorities!
Reply
Anon
2/27/2022 07:22:12 am
Does the civilian system ever ask a grand jury on a recommendation of proper disposition? The only states I am familiar with just have a yes/no probable cause decision.
Reply
2/27/2022 11:50:31 am
I agree that the PHO's PC finding should be binding and the disposition recommendation be just that--a recommendation. We all know that more information comes up after the 32.
Reply
Anon
2/27/2022 02:32:25 pm
I think we only disagree on what the definition of "baseless" is. Baseless pretty clearly means charges which are not supported by probable cause.
Brenner Fissell
2/27/2022 12:17:32 pm
Fire "science" is notorious as junk science. See: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3156796
Reply
AnnoyingProle
2/27/2022 07:28:53 pm
While I agree that Tang is as sharp as they come, one dynamic I've seen in CA actions that doesn't seem to be discuss much is this--they often don't mind losing.
Reply
Cloudesley Shovell
2/28/2022 10:00:44 am
I humbly submit that this issue goes beyond the individual convening authority.
Reply
Tami a/k/a Princess Leia
2/28/2022 07:36:36 pm
CS,
Reply
Poster
3/1/2022 02:02:58 pm
I don't understand the one-sided stance here.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Links
CAAF -Daily Journal -Current Term Opinions ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA Joint R. App. Pro. Global MJ Reform LOC Mil. Law Army Lawyer Resources Categories
All
Archives
April 2022
|