CAAF Grants Review: United States v. Brubaker-Escobar

11/4/2020

"No. 20-0345/AR. U.S. v. Jacob L. Brubaker-Escobar. CCA 20190618. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following personally asserted issue:

WHETHER THE CONVENING AUTHORITY'S FAILURE TO TAKE ACTION ON THE SENTENCE AS A RESULT OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE'S ERRONEOUS ADVICE DEPRIVED THE ARMY COURT OF JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 66, UCMJ.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25."

Elizabeth Berecin

Research Fellow

5 Comments

Poster

11/4/2020 02:22:31 pm

So, I am guessing a jurisdictional question is the reason the ACCA website doesn't mention it.
Was it ever in the paper journal? Darn law library is still closed to the public.

Philip D. Cave link

11/4/2020 04:35:10 pm

Poster.

Likely a summary affirmance. The ACCA does not publish their's like the NMCCA does.

William Cassara link

11/4/2020 05:06:37 pm

Brother Phil is correct. It should be particularly embarrassing when ACCA issues a summary affirmance and CAAF grants review.

Poster

11/4/2020 06:39:17 pm

Ahh. Thank you.

Philip D. Cave link

11/4/2020 05:08:31 pm

On a Grosty no less by the look of it.

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

CAAFlog

CAAF Grants Review: United States v. Brubaker-Escobar

Elizabeth Berecin

Leave a Reply.

Categories

Archives