Read more here.
"Given Advisory Opinion 76, should Reserve Component (RC) judge advocates who are state prosecutors or public defenders be assigned as general or special court-martial military judges, CCA judges, or military magistrates? What about RC judge advocates who are Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Main Justice attorneys, or federal defenders?" Earlier we spotted a case where a federal child obscenity prosecutor sat as an MJ in a child abuse case.
Anonymous
9/30/2021 09:00:26 pm
That advisory opinion is pretty weak support for what you are advocating. It is just a conclusory statement with no analysis, and seems based on federalism and separation of power concerns that aren’t that relevant to the military justice context. It is a stretch.
Attorney
9/30/2021 09:36:42 pm
I have a solution: no more reservist MJs. I mean no direspect, but why do we have them? There is a case to be made that JAGs today are underworked. While I don't agree with that view, I neither find evidence that there is an abundance of courts-martial requiring us to call in the reservists. They do not practice military justice full time, and ours is a constantly evolving system.
Brenner M. Fissell
9/30/2021 11:55:28 pm
This seems obviously right. Why even raise the perception issue?
1984
10/1/2021 03:11:37 am
You still have the converse: part-time civilian prosecutors. Comments are closed.
|
Links
CAAF -Daily Journal -Current Term Opinions ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA Joint R. App. Pro. Global MJ Reform LOC Mil. Law Army Lawyer Resources Categories
All
Archives
April 2022
|