CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

How far have we come

5/30/2021

1 Comment

 
If time begins for us in 1950,  this was said,

1975

Although many questions in this area have now come to be settled, there has been much controversy throughout our history as to which provisions of the Constitution relate to the military and which are concerned only with civilian trials.
. . . 
​​With regard to those provisions of the Fifth Amendment other than trial by jury, however, the same unanimity of agreement is not found. Judge Frank, speaking for the second circuit, said simply: “The Fifth and Sixth Amendments are, of course, inapplicable to a courtmartial.” Other courts have been equally certain that the provisions of both the Fifth and Sixth Amendments are applicable to military trials. Regardless of language to the contrary in some cases, it seems clear that at least some provisions of these two Amendments are generally deemed applicable to court-martial trials. Certainly the reasoning of such a position is more tenable than that of the cases which deprive a person of the protection of the Constitution at a timewhen he has taken up arms to defend it.

Such statements as that of Judge Frank above quoted may be taken to mean only that there is no blanket application of the Amendments to court-martial proceedings. If this is their meaning, the positiontaken is tenable but not well-stated. Such categorical statements should not be used unless they are intended to mean what they say[.]
Ernest L. Langley, Military Justice and the Constitution--Improvements Offered by the New Uniform Code of Military Justice? MIL. L. REV. (Bicentennial Issue) Sept. 1975 at 77.

Compare with,

2020ish

“[T]here has been substantial scholarly debate on applicability of the Bill of Rights to the American servicemember.”  United States v. Graf, 35 M.J. 450, 460 (C.M.A. 1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1085 (1994); see, e.g., Gordon D. Henderson, Courts-Martial and the Constitution: The Original Understanding, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 293 (1957); Frederick B. Wiener, Courts-Martial and the Constitution: The Original Practice pts. 1 & 2, 72 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 266 (1958).  The Bill of Rights itself includes one exception for military justice cases:  the Fifth Amendment’s grand jury provision does not apply to “cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service, in time of War, or public danger.”  The Supreme Court has held that the Sixth Amendment’s right to trial by jury is similarly inapplicable to courts-martial.  The Supreme Court has recognized the applicability of some other portions of the Bill of Rights to the military justice system, though that application is often different than that in a civilian context.  It has reserved judgment on the applicability of some other Bill of Rights provisions.
 
The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ case law recognizes the general applicability of the Bill of Rights to the military justice system[.] See generally, United States v. Easton, 71 M.J. 168 (C.A.A.F. 2012).
Dwight H. Sullivan, The Bill of Rights' Application in the Military Justice System. The paper was originally written for presentation at the Joint Proceedings Panel.
1 Comment
Nathan Freeburg
5/30/2021 08:57:54 pm

I mean the Supreme Court that said the 6th Amendment right to trial by jury does not apply to courts-martial was the same Supreme Court that decided Dred Scott. And just as bogus. One of these days we will give service members the same rights as their civilian counterparts or even illegal aliens. And I will keep fighting until we do.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home