CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

Maurer: An Open, but Difficult, Challenge: Finding the Rationale for a Commander’s GCMCA for all Offenses

10/2/2020

2 Comments

 
Readers of this site know well by now that in the 2020 NDAA, Section 540F, Congress tasked the DoD to conduct a feasibility study of a proposed “alternative” justice system, including the feasibility of a pilot program to test beta versions of such a system.  This alternative would remove Court-Martial Convening Authority for all “felonies” from commanding officers and shift it to senior, experienced judge advocates.  As Michael Paradis wrote, this would be a significant paradigm shift with dramatic practical consequences.  As I wrote previously, the 540F proposal would be an escalation from the usual talk of taking such power away for sex crimes, but was actually quite limited in scope.  It did not ask the DoD to differentiate UCMJ crimes based on anything more than the felony/misdemeanor distinction, thereby ignoring potentially relevant differences between “martial” and “non-martial” offenses (I define “martial offenses” as those military-nexus offenses with no civilian analogue like AWOL, malingering, trainee abuse, disobedience, conduct unbecoming an officer, and various others that may be “prejudicial to good order and discipline”).  Nor did it task DoD to critically analyze or justify the myriad other investigative, prosecutorial, and quasi-judicial authorities currently invested in commanding officers other than court-martial convening authority, like the power to authorize searches and seizures, to arrest, to detain, to confine pre-trial, to decide what to charge, to dismiss charges, to approve plea deals, and to select panel members.  Nor did it require the DoD to conduct any empirical survey or study to collect and quantify useful and relevant data (like, do commanders – at all echelons – actually understand their legal authorities, or do they default to reliance on their judge advocates anyway, and do they want those legal authorities?).  The DoD’s Joint Service Committee’s ad hoc subcommittee for the “Prosecutorial Authority Study” (PAS) completed the 540F task and submitted its Report earlier this month, which Brenner Fissell recently summarized and critiqued here.
[READ FULL ARTICLE BELOW]
maurer_caaflog.pdf
File Size: 198 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Lieutenant Colonel Dan Maurer

Guest

2 Comments
Frank Rosenblatt link
10/2/2020 11:21:13 am

Terrific and thought-provoking work, Dan. This should be required reading.

Reply
Poster
10/3/2020 07:35:35 pm

To be sure your point is not inert.

But for the purpose of this discussion I have to wonder how I let a PFC off post get that far behind the rent. That is; if I am a Division Commander, in my DNA I consider the family as a unit. I consider the wife. I consider the fact that she is unemployed because so many of my other soldiers are starting families.
Do I let a military family fall to the fate of the hellish Texas justice? What effect will that have on good order and discipline, moral?

Or do I first get my Combat Engineer Battalion Commander in front of me and ask:
"Hey dumbass, are you an Academy graduate? It is an engineering school after all. Don't they make decent leaders there? What the hell buddy? Why am I in this situation?"
First Team!? What the hell happened to the team? How did it get so bad that one soldier became that desperate?
I answer these questions. I answer them now because the Deputy III Corps Commander is uniquely qualified to serve on ad hoc panels along with my former Sapper commander.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home