CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

Members of 90-Day Commission on Sexual Assault Announced

3/24/2021

8 Comments

 
Read the DoD Memorandum here.
8 Comments
William Cassara
3/25/2021 08:19:29 am

No representation from the defense side of the house. Nothing about protecting the rights of service members. Let's all act surprised.

Reply
Nathan Freeburg
3/25/2021 09:41:09 am

I know a couple of the people on the list and would characterize them as having concern for the rights of the accused, but I wouldn't call exactly call them members of the defense bar. So, yeah.

Reply
Vulture
3/25/2021 01:26:45 pm

There is some resume padding going on here. Deploying as an S-1 to a Special Troops Battalion doesn't qualify anyone as a 'counselor.'

Reply
Lone Bear
3/25/2021 04:18:20 pm

How many of the commissions are their going to be?

Reply
Charles William Gittins
3/26/2021 10:31:13 am

Meh. Picked to reach a certain conclusion. No defense experts. No one with significant experience with false accusations. Garbage in, Garbage out.

Reply
Tami a/k/a Princess Leia
3/26/2021 11:14:35 am

If only they would put just as much effort into discouraging false accusations, and emphasis on correctly teaching the law instead of, "presume she's telling the truth" and "no means no but yes doesn't always means yes," there would be a lot more progress.

Reply
An0n
3/26/2021 12:36:36 pm

So what is the "conclusion" that is "garbage" that is expected and will "not be a surprise"?

Reply
Poster
3/27/2021 09:22:38 pm

0-Anon,
The point is that if you want to shape the conversation, you need to be part of the conversation. It doesn't take revealing the Rosetta Stone, there are some basic contributions the audience expects.
You need to show that you have heard what the other person has said before you snark rhetorical questions of it. And you have to do more than scare quote someone before they take you seriously at all.

Charlie isn't chafing that the number of women on the panel means that women are to be believed. He isn't bemoaning that the lack of men on the panel mean that they won't be believed. But there has be no lack of input that could have been attached to this panel.

Where are the Phil Cave's? He has testified before. Where are the Terri Zimmermans. She's got some input. Where is a hint of Patricia Hamm? She's been on a panel or two.

Gigo is just saying that what everyone already knows.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home