8 Comments
William Cassara
3/25/2021 08:19:29 am
No representation from the defense side of the house. Nothing about protecting the rights of service members. Let's all act surprised.
Reply
Nathan Freeburg
3/25/2021 09:41:09 am
I know a couple of the people on the list and would characterize them as having concern for the rights of the accused, but I wouldn't call exactly call them members of the defense bar. So, yeah.
Reply
Vulture
3/25/2021 01:26:45 pm
There is some resume padding going on here. Deploying as an S-1 to a Special Troops Battalion doesn't qualify anyone as a 'counselor.'
Reply
Lone Bear
3/25/2021 04:18:20 pm
How many of the commissions are their going to be?
Reply
Charles William Gittins
3/26/2021 10:31:13 am
Meh. Picked to reach a certain conclusion. No defense experts. No one with significant experience with false accusations. Garbage in, Garbage out.
Reply
Tami a/k/a Princess Leia
3/26/2021 11:14:35 am
If only they would put just as much effort into discouraging false accusations, and emphasis on correctly teaching the law instead of, "presume she's telling the truth" and "no means no but yes doesn't always means yes," there would be a lot more progress.
Reply
An0n
3/26/2021 12:36:36 pm
So what is the "conclusion" that is "garbage" that is expected and will "not be a surprise"?
Reply
Poster
3/27/2021 09:22:38 pm
0-Anon,
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Links
CAAF -Daily Journal -Current Term Opinions ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA Joint R. App. Pro. Global MJ Reform LOC Mil. Law Army Lawyer Resources Categories
All
Archives
April 2022
|