CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

More Difficulties with the Military Judges in the Military Commissions

10/5/2020

2 Comments

 
As Carol Rosenberg of the New York Times reported on Friday, Col. Stephen F. Keane, USMC, JAGC, has abruptly recused himself from presiding over the military commission trial of the accused plotters of the September 11th attacks. Col. Keane had only been detailed to preside over the case on 17 September 2020, and had not presided over any of  the cases' long-running series of pre-trial hearings.  His only substantive ruling during his brief tenure was to suspend further pre-trial hearings until 2021 due to risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and his own desire to get up to speed with the case.

In his decision explaining his recusal, Col. Keane cited his work for a counter-terrorism unit of the Criminal Investigation Task Force, which worked in direct support of the Office of the Chief Prosecutor, responsible for the prosecution of detainees before military commissions as well as a further deployment to Iraq. He served in this role from 2003-2004 and insisted that he had no recollection of working on any matters relating to the accused September 11th plotters. A native of New York City, Col. Keane also obliquely referred to "significant personal connection to persons who were directly affected by the events of 9/11" that he only learned over of the past few weeks. Cumulatively, Col. Keane concluded that these facts called the appearance of his impartiality into reasonable question.

Finding properly security cleared and qualified military judges to preside over the Guantanamo military commissions, and the September 11th case in particular, has been a recurring source of difficulty and delay in the proceedings. In 2019, the D.C. Circuit retroactively disqualified a military judge from the USS COLE case for judicial misconduct and vacated more than four years of pre-trial proceedings. As CAAFLog readers know, similar issues risk setting another of the military commissions back in a case that is currently before the D.C. Circuit. And Col. Keane was the fifth military judge to preside over the September 11th case in little more than two years.

​No replacement has yet been announced. 

Michel Paradis

LOAC Editor

2 Comments
Frank Rosenblatt link
10/6/2020 10:18:46 am

To Col. Keane's credit, this is more reason-giving for recusal than most judges offer, military or civilian. On the other hand, R.M.C. 902 permits a ground for disqualification to be waived following full disclosure, and the parties here were deprived of that chance as well as the opportunity to find out facts that would have informed such an election.

A good new article on the topic is at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3700982.

Reply
Don Rehkopf
10/6/2020 10:45:19 am

The key here is Col Keane's recusal cited both RMC 902(a) [which is waivable], and RMC 902(b), which per RMC 902(e), is not waivable, viz., "No military judge shall accept from the parties to the proceeding a waiver of any ground for disqualification enumerated in section (b) of this rule. . . ."

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home