The Joint Service Committee has posted the court-martial numbers for last year. An initial analysis raises some important concerns and questions. Overall, the DoD did 1361 general and specials in FY21, slightly increasing from 1323 in FY20. However, this is still at historic lows. GCMs were up from 720 to 827, but specials fell from 603 to 534. Conviction rates continue to fall, with the defense winning a not guilty verdict in 22% of all GCMs and 17% of all courts. The Air Force continues to lead the way with an extremely high acquittal rate. There were 1129 convictions of some offenses, down from 1140 last year. 57% of convictions resulted in some type of punitive discharge. Again, the vast majority of cases were tried before a judge alone, with only 299 total courts being before members or 22%. Last year 21% of courts were tried before members. By service: The Air Force tried 199 GCMs and 143 SpCMS. The AF conviction rate for GCMs was only 55%, down from 69% last year. Its overall conviction rate was 67%. 45% of convictions resulted in a punitive discharge. Black airmen accounted for 21% of all GCMs and 31% of all specials. The Air Force has 85 ADCs, which works out to four courts per year per ADC and only one court per year with members. The Army tried 394 GCMs and 165 SpCMs. The Army conviction rate for GCMs was 81%, down from 83% last year. Its overall conviction rate was 85%. 60% of convictions resulted in a punitive discharge. Black soldiers accounted for 29% of GCMs and 36% of SpCMs. The Army has 26 AD judges and 23 reserve judges. That comes out to 20 courts per active-duty judge, less depending on how often reserves are used (it really makes one wonder why it took that Army judge 300 days to authenticate a record). There were only four member trials per active-duty Army judge in FY21. The Army has 150 TDS attorneys, less than four courts per year per defense counsel. The Army only had 111 courts with members, less than one per TDS attorney per year. The Navy tried 110 GCMs and 84 SpCMs. The Navy won 72% of the GCMs, down from 83% in FY20. Its overall conviction rate was 79%, with 58% resulting in a punitive discharge. Blacks accounted for 24% of GCMs and 33% of SpCMS. The Marines tried 124 GCMS and 142 SPCMs. The Marines won 85% of its GCMs, down from 92% in FY20. Their overall conviction rate was 86%, with 72% of convictions resulting in a punitive discharge. Blacks accounted for 19% of GCMS and 25% of SpCMs. The Navy and Marines have 25 judges, which works out to 18 courts per year per judge. As with the other services, that includes only about four members court a year for a judge. The data does not paint a picture of a healthy justice system. There are very few opportunities for counsel or judges to try cases, especially in front of members. In particular, the Air Force should be extremely concerned with a 55% conviction rate for GCMs.That should be raising all kinds of red flags. Are they prosecuting the wrong cases or not prosecuting the right ones well? Cultural issues? Something is not right. And likely, the data is worse than it appears. How many of the 1129 convictions are guilty pleas? How many of the remaining convictions are for minor offenses, not the serious charge that led to a court-martial. The real unanswered question is, how does the military do in litigated cases? We simply don't know. Lastly, Blacks are still prosecuted at a much higher rate than whites. Another sign the system is not healthy. (Update 09032022) Comments both to this post as well as others in the past posit that pressure from Congress to take sex assault and rape cases to court-martial are to blame for high acquittal rates. There have been those who claim that virtually all such allegations go to court because of undue pressure on commanders. This allegedly results in the system being overwhelmed by "weak" cases that would never be prosecuted by civilian authorities. These claims can be examined in light of the actual data. Each year, the DoD releases extremely detailed reports on allegations of adult sexual assault and rape cases including a summary of literally every case that proceeded to a court-martial with a charged Article 120 offense. The reports allow us to examine these claims objectively. From FY13 to FY20 there were 39,857 unrestricted reports of sexual assault or rape made to military authorities. Of those almost 40,000 reports, 3303 or 8.3% proceeded to court-martial with 1242 being convicted of an Article 120 offense or 3% of all reports. In other words, during the time of Congressional scrutiny, almost 92% of allegations were not prosecuted. Moreover, the rate of prosecution has dropped steadily during this time from a high of 12.8% in FY13 to a low of 3.9% in FY20. In raw numbers, the services prosecuted the most Article 120 adult cases in FY14 with 588 cases proceeding to court-martial that fiscal year. That number declined to 225 in FY20. Convictions for an Article 120 offense reached its height in FY15 when the military obtained 255 convictions. In FY20, the number of convictions dropped to 50. Some have also claimed the Air Force's low overall conviction rate is due to the Air Force being the most aggressive of the services when it comes to Article 120 cases. The data does not bear that out. In FY20, the Army prosecuted 5.1% of unrestricted reports, the Marines prosecuted 4.6%, the Air Force prosecuted 4.2% and the Navy prosecuted 3.9%. In other words the, Air Force is less likely, not more likely, to prosecute sexual assault cases than the military as a whole. Certainly, sex assault and rape are tough cases to try. However, the data simply doesn't support many assertions and beliefs people have about how often adult sexual assault allegations are prosecuted. Don Christensen
Nathan Freeburg
3/8/2022 09:29:02 pm
A couple cultural points:
Nathan Freeburg
3/10/2022 12:00:56 am
Actually Don, the AF specifically stated to the DAC-IPAD that they will take as a matter of policy any case with a “willing victim” and PC to trial. That’s absolutely a difference. And the difference in board practice is not anecdotal, it’s a function of AF regulations.
Attorney
3/8/2022 09:55:59 pm
What are we comparing this to? AUSAs? Are they really trying more than 3 or 4 jury trials per year? I doubt it.
Old Guy
3/9/2022 05:15:22 pm
The Army metric says four courts per year per DC, not four contested cases. Massive difference. In my experience AUSA’s have more than 3-4 cases per year. Army has 150 TDC and did 559 cases, not 559 contested trial. That’s one case every three to four months. I get that the number is somewhat skewed by senior personnel that don’t take too many cases, but upping it to five cases - not trials - per year is tons less than AUSA’s.
Attorney
3/10/2022 08:14:38 pm
Don't forget that these stats don't capture cases diverted out of the court-martial process after initially being there. And such diversions can be a sign of a healthy system.
Lone Bear
3/8/2022 11:32:52 pm
Great breakdown! Would love to see the contested conviction rate and the 120 conviction rate. Loved the analysis!
Concerned Citizen
3/9/2022 05:51:25 am
Why are low numbers of courts martial concerning? Wouldn't that suggest people are better behaved (which is probably the case)? And/or that commanders are just using more easy and appropriate administrative tools to deal with misconduct; court martialing someone for a marijuana pop hot or being chronically late to work seems inappropriate.
Scott
3/9/2022 07:16:23 am
“Are they prosecuting the wrong cases . . .?”
AF JAG
3/9/2022 11:20:04 am
Fortunately, with Congress giving attorneys the authority to decide which cases are referred, my hypothesis is the Air Force will see less cases going to trial that do not have evidence to support a conviction. In turn, we may see an increase in convictions.
LT Weinberg
3/9/2022 02:04:57 pm
"Lastly, Blacks are still prosecuted at a much higher rate than whites. Another sign the system is not healthy." 3/9/2022 04:41:11 pm
You can read reports and interpret stats, but when you speak to those of us who practice within the military justice system, it is not a "claim" that: "pressure from Congress to take sex assault and rape cases to court-martial are to blame for high acquittal rates...that virtually all such allegations go to court because of undue pressure on commanders. This results in the system being overwhelmed by "weak" cases that would never be prosecuted by civilian authorities." This very thing happens with sickening frequency. I wish that the defense bar in each service branch was free to publish their own detailed descriptions and true accounts of their cases. It would astound most who have no idea what is truly happening within the system. I would also question the author's claim that these stats are being interpreted "objectively." The system is now failing, but not in the way claimed by politicians and advocacy groups. It is now failing because of how it is being forced to act by politicians and advocacy groups. I am just coming from an Art 120 case rejected by civilian authorities, and I am headed to my next case Art 120 case that was also rejected by civilian authorities. These are not outliers. I am regularly submitting Article 32 waivers because even when judges serving as PHOs find no PC and recommend not proceeding to trial, the government proceeds to trial. It's a strange reality being told that the system you practice in isn't really how you know it to be...
Brenner Fissell
3/9/2022 05:59:37 pm
You’d have us take your anecdotal experience over data? 3/9/2022 06:19:53 pm
Brenner, perhaps you have read other published articles about the problems with sexual assault statistics in the military justice system. For example, what constitutes a "sexual assault" complaint. I don't want to get into graphic descriptions to illustrate that not all such allegations are comparable. There are plenty of sexual assault complaints that don't go to trial, because those complaints themselves are not court-martial type complaints to begin with. Like a minor unwanted touching. We shouldn't play games with this topic or with statistics to create a narrative. What I am saying through first-hand experience in the current military justice system, and having practiced in the system since 1995, is that now, when a court-martial type sexual assault complaint is made, prosecutorial discretion is almost completely absent. The GCMCA analysis is this: "Does the complainant want to participate? Yes. Then refer the case to trial." If you choose to reject my observations and experience, and accept the interpretation and narrative of the President of Protect Our Defenders who wrote this post in your blog, that is certainly your prerogative.
Concerned Citizen
3/9/2022 06:28:28 pm
The DAC IPAD report seems like decent data that the military tries a lot of week sex assault cases.
Brenner Fissell
3/9/2022 07:18:40 pm
Richard, no one is interested in (or benefits from) your dueling claims of comparative experience vs. Don C. Don arguably has more experience than you. That doesn't matter. The numbers matter.
Marcus Fulton
3/13/2022 04:51:54 pm
I would. Analyzing MJ with current data is like stacking grapes with a forklift.
Observer
3/9/2022 06:14:18 pm
Civilian prosecutors are way too conservative with what sex cases they prosecute. Drunken date rape is rarely prosecuted, or pled down to a very low level misdemeanor
Scott
3/10/2022 09:41:42 am
Richard, regarding anecdotal experience, you are certainly not alone. The judicial proceedings panel found that: “Judge advocates overwhelmingly reported a perception of pressure on convening authorities to refer sexual assault cases to court-martial, regardless of merit.” 3/9/2022 07:38:13 pm
Brenner, I am not dueling with the President of POD regarding our relative experience. I was answering your critique of my comment that my observations are merely anecdotal as compared to statistics that are being interpreted by the President of an advocacy organization. You say the numbers matter. I ask what do the numbers really mean? First, when the numbers are just about "sexual assault allegations made," that does not mean court-martial type sexual assault allegations. There are plenty of allegations that fall under the generic term of "sexual assault" that are properly handled with administrative action. So, you can't say, for example, that only 10 out of 100 sexual assault allegations went to court, and that represents a problem...if 90 of those allegations are not court-martial type allegations. When we talk about conviction rates and concerns about them, what we are talking about is a preferred case, that was then referred to trial, and then resulted in acquittal. So, what I am saying in that scenario is that the decision point between a preferred case and a referral decision has lost prosecutorial discretion. Weak cases are routinely being referred to trial because GCMCAs are no longer willing to take the heat for exercising discretion if a complainant is willing to participate. As such, a low conviction rate with respect to referred courts-martial is a direct result of GCMCA's pencil-whipping referral decisions to shield themselves from scrutiny. Again, you are certainly free to reject my observations, but my observations are shared by every military defense counsel that I have spoken with in every service branch. Again, that is anecdotal. I'm not trolling this topic or trolling POD. I want to make sure that this blog does not become a forum to push the narratives being pushed by POD and Sen. Gillibrand without counterpoints being considered.
Nathan Freeburg
3/9/2022 11:56:16 pm
I have to at least partially agree with Rich here. Apples and oranges. Unless you are using the same definition of “sexual assault” as civilian prosecutors (which the military is not), the “data” is meaningless. The military will charge and take to trial (and lose) a derrière slap leaving the gym as a sexual assault. I saw that as recently as last week. Data is only meaningful when you are working with the same definitions and understand the base rate.
AnnoyingProle
3/10/2022 12:15:39 am
Stevens, your broad and shared sense of indignation is not meaningless, but the anecdotal outrage of defense counsel is hard to weigh effectively. I've also seen my share of bull**** cases move forward, both by cool-aid drinking prosecutors and by CAs and JAG COs who don't want to say "No" to a reporting victim.
Concerned Citizen
3/10/2022 06:00:44 am
A good starting point would be, as you mentioned, clearly defining terms. When I hear "sexual assault", I hear "penis in an orifice". However, "sexual assault" is often pretty freely used to include a wide range of other misconduct. I certainly don't think that say, a supervisor who slaps his subordinate on the butt is appropriate, but he doesn't need to be court martialed.
Old Guy
3/10/2022 08:48:33 am
If you have ever worked as a TC you know the vast majority of 120 cases are recommended against prosecution. It is not even close to the amount that come in versus get preferred. A significant percent have victim's rights attorneys who are rationale professionals. And not every victim is gunning for a court-martial, many often want a fair review of their allegation and accept no pros as a fair shake. Sure there are outliers and no doubt some cases are pushed to trial by a combination of factors that press the system (as if other systems do not have pressure). But the vast majority of 120 allegations are no pros recommendation by TCs and accepted by SJAs, CAs, victim's attorneys, and victims. I'd be curious to hear from former TCs or SJAs who are now DC's or civilian DC about their view as their time as Gov't attorneys. Everyone has an outlier story, but on a general basis. 3/10/2022 07:31:07 am
Prole, in response to your question, in my opinion, the best way to combat interpretations of data is more accurate information about the data (with appropriate privacy safeguards). If there was a DoD wide database in which every Art 120 allegation in every service branch was accurately tracked the same way, at the ground level, from report to resolution, in which more details were required than are now provided, and both the government and defense had inputs for each case, you would be able to see what is falling under the broad category of "sexual assault," whether cases were declined by the civilians, whether cases were referred despite Article 32 PHO recommendations to the contrary, what cases were handled administratively and why, and see what may have led to an acquittal at trial or dropping a case. That way, for every Art 120 report that did not ultimately result in a trial or a trial conviction, you could simply click on the case report and see why. While I know reporting and tracking does currently exist in some form, it does not provide enough information as reflected by interpretations of data where information is absent. But, the more information that is available, the less opportunity there is for those with agendas to push narratives - on both sides of the debate. And, it is a sad commentary that this system is under such constant political efforts to change it that such detailed reporting would be necessary to avoid interpretations and narratives with varying degrees of inaccuracy. 3/11/2022 08:42:55 pm
https://www.lawfareblog.com/division-authority-between-special-trial-counsel-and-commanders-under-uniform-code-military-justice Comments are closed.
|
Links
CAAF -Daily Journal -Current Term Opinions ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA Joint R. App. Pro. Global MJ Reform LOC Mil. Law Army Lawyer Resources Categories
All
Archives
April 2022
|