CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

Supreme Court Update

6/5/2021

7 Comments

 
United States v. Bess. Those following the cert. petition with the U.S. Supreme Court previously reported here filed by Pedro Bess, a Black U.S. sailor challenging the secretive process of how panel members were selected where he was convicted by an all-white jury of sexual misconduct against white women. Many of us already argue that the convening authority has an unlimited number of peremptory challenges through the selection process so why should trial counsel have any at trial and the defense so few. 

Petition.
Government Response.
Bess's Reply.  

Cheers, PC.
7 Comments
Isaac Kennen
6/6/2021 07:33:17 am

From the petition:

“The Convening Authority’s member selection process resulted in four hand- selected all-White general court-martial panels (juries) for four Black servicemembers accused of sex offenses in less than a year.”

Reply
Lone Bear
6/6/2021 12:25:07 pm

Hope the Supremes give it a look. Bess really lays out some systemic problems, and the facts of this case makes some of the issues look intentional rather than just part of the process.

Reply
Reader
6/6/2021 08:07:44 pm

“This court cannot even be sure of the members’ race as the record is absent of any questions posed during voir dire to the members by either counsel or the military judge regarding the members’ racial or ethnic background.” Bess, NMCCA Slip Opinion, at 16.

“...because the questionnaires did not have this information, and because Appellant declined to inquire into the races during voir dire, we don’t know with certainty what race any member save one identifies as.” Bess, 81 M.J. 1, 7 (C.A.A.F. 2020).

“I see no reason to question the good faith of Appellant and his counsel in assuming that none of the panel members at his court-martial was African American based on outward appearances. But this Court cannot rely on this assumption in deciding this case because nothing in the record provides a basis for concluding that the assumption is correct.” Concurring Opinion of Judge Maggs.

“Were there any African Americans on the panel at Appellant’s court-martial?” Dissenting Opinion of Judge Ohlson.

“As the record currently stands, we do not know if . . . all-white panels may have been assigned to cases involving African American defendants accused of sexual offenses.” Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sparks.

Reply
Philip D. Cave link
6/7/2021 07:28:38 am

Was this case suitable for a Dubay hearing ordered by NMCCA (or CAAF)? If, on what little record there is and the seriousness of the issue, the defense had not done enough--Dubay?

Also, is there anything in the record from the Government that contradicts (or explains) the assertions made by the defense as offiicers of the court?

Reply
Big Dawg
6/7/2021 06:31:58 pm

Phil, isn’t a Dubay hearing discretionary?

Reply
Philip D. Cave link
6/7/2021 10:42:46 pm

Yes.

Lone Bear
6/7/2021 09:05:41 am

Seems like a head in the sand response to me, by an all white NMCCA panel. It was an all white panel, but turning a blind eye is easier for the court. Or blame the defense. I’m sure their voir dire questions to the all white panel should have been about how white they were, good start for the defense there. Any chance we can voir dire the court?

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home