CAAFlog
  • Home

CAAFlog

United States v. Willman

7/22/2021

 
In Willman, CAAF holds that a CCA does not "have authority to consider outside-the-record evidence submitted in support of an appellant’s Eighth Amendment or Article 55, UCMJ, claims when performing sentence appropriateness review under Article 66(c), UCMJ." The court concludes that the plain language of Article 66, UCMJ, and the decision in United States v. Jessie, 79 M.J. 437 (C.A.A.F. 2020) require this conclusion. AFCCA's Willman decision is affirmed. (Judges Sparks and Ohlson dissented.) At AFCCA, Willman complained that he,
suffered cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment and Article 55, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 855, when he was not given proper medical treatment while in confinement. Alternatively, Appellant contends that the conditions of his post-trial confinement render his sentence inappropriately severe, warranting relief under Article 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
In Jessie, the ACCA, sitting en banc, concluded they had no authority to consider the appellant's First, Fifth, Eighth Amendment claims about conditions of post-trial confinement, and that to do so would be "inappropriate." (Four of ten judges dissented.) Jessie was one of the cases complaining about being deprived of contact with his minor children while confined at the USDB. CAAF affirmed the ACCA. In Jessie, CAAF made several points about a CCA's "broad discretionary power" of review as to sentence.
  • The CCA may not approve a sentence that is unlawful, e.g., violates the Eighth.
  • The CCA may not approve a sentence that is "excessive."
  • The CCA is limited to considering only the "entire" record. The entire record,
[I]nclude[s] the "record of trial" and "allied papers." Under the Rules for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) applicable to this case, the "record of trial" contains all of the items listed in R.C.M. 1103(b)(2), and the "allied papers" are items now identified as "matters attached to the record" in accordance with R.C.M. 1103(b)(3). In addition, the "entire record" also includes briefs and arguments that government and defense counsel (and the appellant personally) might present regarding matters in the record of trial and "allied papers."
79 M.J. at 440-41 (emphasis added).

We can, again, glean several points from Willman, Jessie, United States v. Healy, 26 M.J. 394 (C.M.A. 1988), and United States v. Fagnan, 12 C.M.A. 192, 30 C.M.R. 192 (1961).
  • A CCA does not give clemency, partly because they are not "probation and parole boards."  Fagnan, 12 C.M.A. at 195.
  • A CCA does not give sentence appropriateness relief for confinement facility rules and regulations affecting the usual conditions and management of the facility or prisoners.
  • Fagnan "established a clear rule that the CCAs may not consider anything outside the "entire record" when reviewing a sentence." Jessie, 79 M.J. at 441, citing Edward S. Adamkewicz Jr., Appellate Consideration of Matters Outside the Record of Trial, 32 Mil. L. Rev. 1, 16 (1966).
The dissent of course recognizes that when an Appellant attaches documents or declarations to the record--through Grostefon perhaps, do they not become part of the entire record?

Cheers, Phil Cave.

V
7/22/2021 11:34:33 am

Limited site now on Appellate Defense to see sealed documents now too, isn't that right? These records are not supposed to be a way to cover the Government. By limited content/visibility, plus serving the Government interest in finality, collateral review is going to be more common when the Accused is in the hokey.

Didn't Zach allude to something like this? Feels like l just wrote a song, that's familiar. Then realize Prince did it first.

Tami a/k/a Princess Leia
7/22/2021 12:07:36 pm

I guess now we'll be seeing a LOT of habeas corpus litigation in federal district courts.

I hope this case gets to SCOTUS. Federal inmates get to go back to district court for post-conviction relief over stuff like this, but obviously now military inmates can't. Convening authorities can't provide relief, and now appellate courts won't be providing relief either, since they won't be considering declarations attached to the record.


Comments are closed.
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Links
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global MJ Reform
    LOC Mil. Law
    Army Lawyer
    Resources

    Categories

    All
    Daily Journal
    MJ Reform
    Question Time
    Scholarship
    Top Of The Year 2021
    Unanimous
    Week In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

The views expressed on this website are expressed in the authors' personal capacities.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home